The anti-constitutional revolution of 1937 continues: the supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel, upholding as lawful the National Labor Relations Act.
[added 7/17/2022] Thanks to Jim Lorenz for this entry.
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
—- Isaiah 5:20
When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing; when you see that money is flowing to those who deal not in goods, but in favors; when you see that men get rich more easily by graft than by work, and your laws no longer protect you against them, but protect them against you. … you may know that your society is doomed.
—- Francisco d’Anconia, Atlas Shrugged
The anti-constitutional revolution of 1937 continues: the supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing: a small, intra-state clothing manufacture has an effect, however slight, on interstate commerce, and is thus subject to regulation by the Federal government.
[added 7/17/2022]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing, 301 U.S. 58 (1937).
John T. Flynn, The Decline of the American Republic: And How to Rebuild It, (New York: Devin-Adair, 1955; Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007), 111.
Calvin D. Linton, ed., The Bicentennial Almanac: 200 Years of America, 1776-1976, (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson, 1975), 342.
Current U.s. National Debt:
