Merry Christmas! After the second recount in the disputed popular United states senate election (in accordance with the fraudulent 17th amendment) between Republican (fascist/socialist) CONgressman Louis C. Wyman, of new hampshire, and Democratic (socialist/fascist) John A. Durkin, former state Insurance Commissioner that Durkin previously won by 10 votes, sees declaration of a different winner:
- Wyman—110,926;
- Durkin—110,924;
- American Independent (dominionist) Carmen C. Chimento, a perennial candidate—1,513.
Question: How did Chimento’s vote total increase by 14% between election night and the second recount?
NOTES:
- Were the election held in accordance with Article I, Section 3 [Clause 1], no recount would have been necessary as the next Senator would have been elected by the State legislature as a matter of public record, and the legislature of New Hampshire would have a representative in Congress.
- As attorneys (Officers of the Court) both Durkin and Wyman were ineligible to serve in two branches of government at the same time, according to Article I, Section 6 [Clause 2].
Postscript: Seven months later the senate voted (YEA, 71; NAY, 29) to declare the seat vacant, and a special election was held.
[added 11/14/2022]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
http://www.salazar.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/contested_elections/pdf/137_May_22_1975_Durkin.pdf
www.salazar.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/contested_elections/pdf/137_May_22_1975_Durkin.pdf
United States Senate election in New Hampshire, 1974 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_New_Hampshire,_1974
Current U.s. National Debt:
