The supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western new york, provisions imposing “fixed buffer zone” limitations are constitutional, but the provisions imposing “floating buffer zone” limitations violate the First Amendment.
NOTE: This decision involved the issue of abortion on demand. At this time the court had a 5:4 majority of justices, who had been appointed by ostensibly pro-life Republican (fascist/socialist) presidents Reagan and George Herbert “Read my lips, no new taxes” Walker Bush. If all other Republican appointees are included, that coalition increases to 7:2. This should serve as further notice to opponents of abortion-on-demand that the Republican Party has no intention of honoring its pro-life pledge.
[restored 11/27/2020]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_new_york