The supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down Lynch v. Household Finance: Via the fraudulent 14th amendment,
[T]he dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights is a false one. Property does not have rights. People have rights. The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less than the right to speak or the right to travel, is, in truth, a “personal” right, whether the “property” in question be a welfare check, a home, or a savings account.
NOTE: In rendering this decision, the court ignored the connecticut constitution of 1965, article I, section 1.
[restored 7/4/2025]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
Lynch v. Household Finance Corporation, 405 U.S. 538, 552 (1972).
Gerald Gunther, Constitutional Law, twelfth edition, (Westbury, New York: Foundation Press, 1991), 465.
Current U.s. National Debt:
