Woe unto you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge.
—- Luke 11:52
While the United states Armed Forces (private mercenaries) are stationed at 737 bases, in 130 nations around the world, defending “all freedom-loving people everywhere in the world,” the supreme court, of the corporate United states, hands down indiana v. Edwards, denying the right of U.s. subject/enemy/citizens to defend themselves in court, if they are assessed by a psychiatrist as mentally incompetent.
NOTE: The editors believe the unstated reason for this ruling is to prevent defendants, especially in tax protest and victimless crime cases, from presenting their case to the jury “pro se” (Latin for “for oneself”) in an effort to put an unjust statute on trial (Jury Nullification).
[restored 1/9/2021]
Interested students of Justice should read Thomas Szasz:
Scholarly articles for Thomas Szasz myth of mental illness
- The myth of mental illness – Szasz – Cited by 2152
- The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of … – Szasz – Cited by 699
- The uses of naming and the origin of the myth of mental … – Szasz – Cited by 32
–– JL
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
“Law of the Jungle”
ccc-2point0.com/preface
References:
“A Fool For a Client,” Los Angeles Times, 28 June 2008, A24.
Address to the Nation on Domestic Programs.
www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/239998
Indiana v. Edwards – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_v._Edwards