The supreme court, of the corporate United states, decides New State Ice v. Liebmann, licensing may not be used by established businesses to prevent competition. In a dissenting opinion, associate justice Louis D. Brandeis writes,
It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.
NOTE: Although Brandeis uses the word “country” here, the editors believe that he meant to use the word “Union,” which is a union of sovereign States under a federal system, with a central government whose powers are strictly limited by a respected Constitution; as opposed to “nation,” in which a central government, with almost limitless power, treats its constituent states as mere enclaves, provinces, or sub-divisions of its greater self.
[added 7/2/2022] Thanks to Jim Lorenz, Chuck McGlawn and Bill Holmes for this entry.
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
Article X of Amendment
ccc-2point0.com/constitution-for-the-united-states
References:
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_State_Ice_Co._v._Liebmann
200606095331 – 23055.pdf – pdf2html
pdfdl.oceighty.net/pdf2html.php?url=http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20060606095331-23055.pdf