The Old Court/New Court controversy ends: The reestablished old Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky decides Hildreth’s Heirs v. McIntire’s Devisees, asserting that the 77 decisions of the rival, disenfranchised new Court of Appeals are now “null and void.”
Postscript: A century later, in Smith v. Overstreet’s Administrator, the supreme court/court of appeals of the commonwealth of kentucky, declared these decisions to be not part of the state case law.
Question: What will it take to get our current Federal “new” court decisions—those decisions—handed down on all three levels, by Federal justices and judges who have been confirmed by unlawfully elected senates (within the provisions of the fraudulent 17th amendment) to also be declared to be “null and void?”
[added 12/31/2021]
Subsequent Events:
Authority:
Kentucky Constitution of 1799, Article IV, Sections 3 and 4
oll.libertyfund.org/title/thorpe-the-federal-and-state-constitutions-vol-iii-kentucky-massachusetts#lf1514-03_head_020
References:
Old Court — New Court controversy – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Court_—_New_Court_controversy
Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Kentucky State Bar Association… – Google Books
www.google.com/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_Annual_Meeting_of_the/QPo8AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Hildreth%27s+Heirs+v.+McIntire%27s+Devisees++%22April%22+%221829%22&pg=PA64&printsec=frontcover